This is why VCs bring in the MBAs
Spent a bunch of time this evening (ok, morning now) getting started on integrating categories into DrunkenBlog, and seeing what kind of a speed hit might be associated with them. The actual category pages are pretty rough, as, well, I hit my RSS feeds and saw the new "MovableType Publishing Platform" announcement and got distracted by the sound of my head banging against the wall.
MT is decent software, even if its kind of rough in areas. But what they're looking at doing is just silly, and is going to be incredibly detrimental. They've always had very... "iffy" licensing, and lots of people have been chomping at the bit and looking for alternatives... but a combination of inertia and features kept people using or trying to work around the license issues.
But this is just beyond stupid, it's just obvious they don't "get it". And really the reaction looks to be about 95% negative.
Oh, I'm sure they'll try to spin it... At some point soon you'll see one of them come out and try to throw all sorts of spin on this, using lots of vague terms and mentioning "people who have to live", "mouths to feed", "features aren't free", etc. in the coming while.
Unfortunately since they don't "get it" it means they're going to be extremely guarded and somewhat genuinely surprised at the backlash, but they also view the users as separate from themselves, so they think it'll die down and there'll be a few statements from them akin to: "we understand your concerns, but trust us...".
When you consider how vastly & immediately negative the response has been, and they still seem to be saying "this will be best for everyone!" over and over as a mantra as though saying it enough times will make it true... that's already started.
Oh, it will die down, but mostly because users become resigned to using something else, primarily because they've been given the incentive to do so. And as they do, the network effect starts to take hold, with more users equaling more attention & features... and eventually one gets marginalized.
This was already going to happen (and was already happening) under the original fubar license due to ISPs and hosting providers, but most were hoping MovableType would get with it and the 3.0 license would work most of that out. Ah well, it just would have taken longer under the old license, as people just have more incentive now. Oh well.
The last company I saw do this that I actually had any sort of time/money investment in was Codetek, with their VirtualDesktop product. I can tell you they had it all laid out for them: why what they were going to with their pricing & feature bundling was wrong, and what was going to happen, and why they were screwing themselves.
It's all happened, and they know they have a problem, which is why you've seen them change their pricing & feature bundling several times in an effort to stem the tide, why they've tried to do some of the things I suggested in a way that completely negates the value of doing them, and why they are constantly running "special sales". But now its too late, and they're being eaten from the bottom, and they're just annoying and confusing their users to an even greater degree with all the backtracking and mucking around while the alternatives improve and even surpass them in some areas as the user-base builds and more support comes in.
The same thing is going to happen with MT... I doubt they'll try to revise the license before 3.0 really ships, as that would just make them feel foolish, but they will when they realize what's starting to go on after the first influx of cash. But I doubt they'll get it even then. They may lower their pricing, thinking that's the real issue, but it won't solve much. Then they'll try to play with features included between the various licenses, and all the while their user-base will eventually shrink. In between all that you'll see some serious circling of the wagons, with more proprietary & incompatible tech included.
Oh, they'll make some cash, no doubt about that... lots of people will feel locked-in, in that they've already sold a client on a solution and to change would just be too big of a hassle, or their sunk costs are perceived to be too large.
And if SixApart ends up doubling the prices come 3.5 or 4.0, people will feel as though they have sunk costs they need to recoup. Watch for the blog-wars, where the MT users disparage the alternatives, because well, MT will have X features and it's what the people who say they appreciate the finer touches use... but really MT will be what they know through built-up inertia, or it may become a veblen.
I could be wrong, and they'll get smacked by this and make a sweeping change, but it's doubtful, and I wish it wasn't. I'm inherently lazy, and I have my own inertia investment built up in MT... so I'd really like to be wrong about this, but I know I'm going to have to end up using something else so I'm not banging my head against the wall after every stupid thing they do. That guanxi spot in my heart is already taken by another technology company with a fruit logo.
This is basic path dependancy stuff, and once you've hit that road you only have so long to backtrack before there's no way you can make it to the station behind or ahead of you without running out of gas. SixApart is just the latest company to fall victim to marketing myopia, they're just doing it in a spectacularly glaring way.
Real Software is another good example of a company who's screwed the pooch this badly, and still hasn't really "gotten it". They're both akin to an infant, they can see where they want to go, but don't have the control to get there. Sure they make some progress towards the shiny thing, but it's more accidental from the general flailing than anything.
During the .com days, the venture capitalists walked into companies and pushed MBAs and marketing guys down their throats, and oh how it was resented. "It's about the tech, stupid!".
In some cases these MBA and marketing types screwed the pooch, but by and large these guys were brought in because almost invariably when someone hits a specific size and scope they run into big, big trouble. They don't know about things like price points, the network effect, social capital, prospect theory, conjoint analysis, sustainable competitive advantage or porter analysis, but I can pretty much guarantee their users are going to become very, very familiar with price elasticity.
Those links and 20 minutes should give you a handle of why they're in trouble, but at this point it doesn't really matter. They've run an excel spreadsheet that says X users at Y price will mean mad cash... showing them something like a bell curve with price points is voodoo to them after they've seen that spreadsheet sum.
Now don't get me wrong... they might think they understand some of these things in a roundabout way: like I said, they know where they want to get... they're all about the vendor lock-in. They just have no clue about getting there. We've just been down this road before, there are a myriad of examples to point to if you're so inclined... this is how MySQL got its start, then Gnome...
Ah well, I'm really glad I decided against using some of the more syntax-butchering plugins out there until the licensing got ironed out (I've kinda predicted it for awhile to various people), so whatever I push to will be relatively painless.
I've started looking at WordPress, which uses MySQL> & PHP and is getting good buzz and has v1.2 in beta which should be out very soon. It's GPL'd, as in you don't need to worry about drastic things happening... all you have to worry about is continued development.
Feature-wise it seems to be going just fine for free so far, but really at the cost of some of these movabletype licences, if there was something you had to have in it, it'd pay itself back very, very quickly. And chances are there's something you want that company or individual X may want in it and it'll show up sooner rather than later... the network effect.
So far I've found this excellent page on migrating from Movabletype to WordPress, including links to tutorials and tools for converting a movabletype-based site to WordPress, comparisons of MT's tags to WordPress', example styles, frequently asked questions, and various forum & support links. My favorite was a reference to a tool that will spit out pages during the conversion so that all your MT-based urls redirect to the corresponding WordPress url.
There's also Textpattern, which I'm still going through, but it looks pretty decent. Looks like the worst of this will be just having to learn something a little new, and a frill here and there.
Slick stuff, looking forward to going through it.
Comments (17)
Posted by: drunkenbatman at May 14, 2004 11:49 AM
Unfortunately a lot of people are going to see my comment as when I tracked them, it said it failed to ping due to a timeout... resaved, same error. Tried again, same thing. Said it failed again, so I gave up to check out the other posts... lots of drunkenblog pings that apparently made it through. Wtf.
Damn, sorries. Wasn't intentional.
Posted by: Jeffrey at May 14, 2004 12:30 PM
Right on. Market forces are important. But don't forget the Lawyers! I don't think I can even use their personal license because my web host has dual P3s. They're on crack.
But hey its a Friday so I know what I'm doing for the weekend!
Posted by: Barbarians_Atz_Ze_Gates at May 14, 2004 02:45 PM
Oh, you say Oh a lot. And dont use god damned big words like price points, the network effect, social capital, prospect theory, conjoint analysis, sustainable competitive advantage, porter analysis or what all stuff without going into what they are! I'm going to be reading all day and not all have degrees is economics. I got the main points though.
Your spot on with mysql but I can't remember the database that it replaced. MSQL? Something. I was a longtime frontier & userland user, but when they went closed it decimated the users. community is a shadow of what it used to be.
Posted by: Chesopeke at May 14, 2004 05:06 PM
What I don't get is how they can't be sued for false advertising. AS A DESIGNER I HAVE MADE RECO'S ON THEIR SOFTWARE for over HALF A YEAR based on what they promised. They did not deliver on that promise and NOW I HAVE TO GO TO MY CLIENTS AND TELL THEM TO EXPECT A HUGE JUMP IN COST in the next upgrade.
Lots of other companies get sued by this, it will have a MAOJR BLOW ON MY BUSINESS. Sign me up for the nearest class action suit, companies CANT DO THIS SHIT.
Posted by: Jay Solo at May 14, 2004 06:21 PM
With your coverage of the business angle, this would be a good post to enter in Carnival of the Capitalists.
Posted by: Gerard Van der Leun at May 14, 2004 09:59 PM
Deep down the truth is that, if the Trotts are not assholes, Joi Ito is and, along with Anil, this has his greasy thumbprints all over it.
Posted by: Liz Lawley at May 14, 2004 10:12 PM
Excellent post, excellent points.
Gerard, I know the Trotts, and consider Joi and Anil to be friends. None of them are assholes. This is a case of terrible judgment, not malice.
Posted by: Janice Brown at May 15, 2004 02:34 AM
What I cannot understand is why 6A didnt ask MT users what they thought would be a reasonable licence and price. It would have been simple to take a poll of the MT "community" - with a list of questions in a post on her blog, the answers coming as posts on MT blogs tracking back to her directly, and in copious detail.
As for you drunken-master....
Sometimes you come across writing that is so good it immediately engages you and holds your attention. This was one of those posts; full of excellent links and new iniformation (Velben Good.....aaaahhhhh!). I have to say that using phrases like "screwed the pooch" let you down, but that aside, I felt that this article was a cut above the rest. Really rather good indeed.
Posted by: Mike at May 15, 2004 03:08 AM
Wow, what insight. It's what we've all beene xperiencing and thinking for years, put into words. Bravo!
Now the only question is is what do we do about the future if we know it and cannot change it. ;)
Posted by: M. Simon at May 15, 2004 04:54 AM
I thought "screwed the pooch" was excellent.
It means screwing up so bad in public that the social disgrace will always leave a trail that follows you.
It is a term that is most often heard in the military. Glad to see it entering civilian life.
Posted by: Liz Lawley at May 15, 2004 10:39 AM
Janice, 6A did do focus groups on pricing, and some qualitative surveying. I can see not wanting to survey the entire community, because then you're guaranteed to anger the people whose suggestions you don't take. But the process was clearly flawed, and they are really paying the price.
For what it's worth, these are good people who are devastated by the response they've gotten, and who are trying to make things right. But Pandora's Box is open now, and that's clearly not undoable.
Posted by: Janice Brown at May 16, 2004 04:57 AM
I think MT is a great piece of software. I have personally made around $4000 US dollars from reccomending it, installing it and creating templates for it. One of those companies is a PR firm with 6 blogs and over 20 authors. This PR firm is staffed by computer illiterates; it was very hard to sell them the idea of blogging to run their website, and even harder to sell them MT as the solution, since they - and im not making this up - dont even know what the term "cut and paste" means.
Now, if I want to upgrade them to MT3 to make more money out of them, I cant do this, thanks to the licence restrictions. I am going to have to find another solution, or break the MT licence deliberately by throwing together a hack of the Perl source, and I wont do that.
Its easy to slam 6A in hindsight, but honestly, using a traditional focus group is just absurd. MT and trackbacks clearly =are= a focus group tool, moreso for 6A than any other company, since all the participants are "plugged in" to the process in advance. They also seemed to miss questioning all the key bloggers (opinion formers) about this, and that is rather strange to say the least.
6A must have been aware of Wordpress and the other truely free alternatives gaining ground out in the wild. All it takes is a clutch of developers and a GPL piece of software like Wordpress can outstrip commercial software like MT very quickly, and as Diveintomark has said in the clearest post about this, nothing can beat real freedom. He sent the $535 he would have been forced to pay to 6A to Wordpress, and nearly instantly moved his blog from MT to Wordpress. File under instant democracy. If only it worked with national governments like that!
It would have been better for 6A to take the small amount of anger over suggestions not taken than face this instant exodus AND boiling lava anger. On the same subject, this sort of "vote with your feet" switching is going to be more dramatic in the future. Imagine if Wordpress had written a migration tool. Think about that. From now on, migration tools are going to be the weapons that destroy enemy software. But I digress.
As for them being good people, almost everyone seems to agree with this. They made a mistake, and are not evil and greedy. I recon that they probably could undo this damage before the ship sinks. I'm not able to say what sort of licence they should adopt for the MT masses (having to find a way to pay 20 staff), but one thing is for certain; moving to Wordpress is frighteningly easy. Diveintomark has shown this. Whatever they are going to do, they need to do it immediately, or they will permamently loose the MT user base, destroy the plugin developer network (as developers flock to Wordpress) and most vitally loose the momentum that MT has built up. The developers leaving is almost more dangerous than users leaving, because once Wordpress equals or surpasses MT, 6A is truely finished.
Posted by: Nancy McGough at May 16, 2004 03:37 PM
Janice, you say that "I have personally made around $4000 US dollars from recommending it, installing it and creating templates for it." If you had either the "Limited Commercial Use License" ($150) or the "PERSONAL, NON-COMMERCIAL USE LICENSE" (gratis), then according to the old MT license, you were prohibited from "receiving compensation for any service that uses the Software, including support services." But maybe you had bought a different license from them?
This [old] MT license is the reason that I never seriously considered using MT. I discussed this in the comments of the Mysterium blog in February 2004 here:
http://mysterium.aqualyrica.com/archives/001068.html
I agree that 6A seems to desperately need a good MBA and lawyer on their team. My guess is that this fiasco will become a classic biz school case study of what not do in business.
Posted by: Boston website design at September 10, 2004 06:30 PM
That's a pretty interesting view on that!
Posted by: Zoltik at January 22, 2005 05:08 PM
Nice thread.
Posted by: Peter Back at August 30, 2005 04:47 PM
Good work. I like your site. http://www.pcmcourseware.com , http://www.drneils.com.au








My thoughts exactly ... in fact I recall muttering to myself yesterday ... they need an MBA.
Personally, I think they may have tried to apply their successful TypePad schedule to MovableType.
I blog about this in gory detail, but basically, they pushed loyal users into considering other options by charing too much for too few features.